Talk:Application Services Library

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Spam

Bold textASL APPLICATION SERVICES LIBRARY

What is ASL?

ASL offers a framework for application management that is based on the best practices of professionals with years of experience. The model has been developed in such a way that it guarantees optimum ICT support for business processes, thus allowing you to focus on your core business. ASL limits itself to providing guidelines for structuring processes and leaves the structure of the management organisation entirely open. As a result of this, the framework is generally applicable within the ICT service sector, regardless of the size of your organisation.

File:Http://www.aslfoundation.org/typo3temp/pics/0a1447fc32.jpg

Confusing

This description of the "library" is rather vague and unclear in places. I write programs for a living, so I think I should have gotten something out of reading it. Do any real-life organizations actually use this document? If so, how is it used in practice? Do people get vocabulary lessons when they are hired? Is this useful? Are there more popular competitors? How is it publicized? What is the history and (in)significance of this genre? -- Beland 01:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was referred from the copy-edit category, but this can't be copy-edited unless someone first translates into ordinary English. I agree with Beland that it needs to establish notability as well - it seems like a bit of an ad. Intensify 11:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, new at this. Put the technical tag on the article - just found out this one is supposed to be used on talk pages. Intensify 12:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Application Services Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512224526/http://www.aslbislfoundation.org/nl/asl/publicaties/whitepapers/doc_download/334-2008-januari--alignment-white-paper-itilr-v3-and-asl to http://www.aslbislfoundation.org/nl/asl/publicaties/whitepapers/doc_download/334-2008-januari--alignment-white-paper-itilr-v3-and-asl

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]