Talk:ACM Computing Reviews

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

http://www.reviews.com/search/search_results.cfm --222.64.22.104 (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This editor is an anon IP troll with a long history of challenging trivial facts in science articles. Dob't waste your time responding andy (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ACM Computing Reviews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120803012915/http://www.computingreviews.com/ to http://www.computingreviews.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120803012915/http://www.computingreviews.com/ to http://www.computingreviews.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]