 |
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy | | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
|
|
There is only one source for the article and nothing specifically for "anti-razor" which says that when two things are not sufficient to prove a proposition, a third thing will be necessary. How is this in opposition to "plurality should not be posited without necessity"? JimCubb (talk) 21:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]