Draft:Reader Expectation Approach

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,267 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Reader Expectation Approach (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 11 days ago by Rewagoner (talk: D · +) · Last edited 11 days ago by Citation bot

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 11 days ago. (Update) This draft has been submitted and is currently awaiting review.

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent sources. (April 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. (April 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Reader Expectation Approach (REA) is a framework for writing clearly and persuasively, developed by American rhetorician and educator George David Gopen, also published as George D. Gopen. REA is based on the premise that readers of English derive approximately 85% of their interpretive clues not from word choice or word meaning, but from the structural location of words within a sentence and sentences within a paragraph.^[1][2][3]

Gopen's professional title is Professor Emeritus of the Practice of Rhetoric at Duke University. He received both a JD and a PhD from Harvard.^[4] Gopen developed REA through his professional experience as a consultant, educator, and classical musician, with music serving as a particularly strong influence on his thinking about structure and meaning.^[5] By 1990, he had established an independent writing consultancy, applying REA concepts across scientific, legal, academic, business, and government writing.^[4] REA was introduced to a wide audience through Gopen's 1990 article, co-authored with Judith A. Swan, titled "The Science of Scientific Writing," published in American Scientist.^[1]

Gopen developed REA in publications including American Scientist^[6] and the American Bar Association's Litigation journal,^[7][8] and in three books: The Sense of Structure: Writing from the Reader's Perspective;^[2] Expectations: Teaching Writing from the Reader's Perspective;^[3] and Gopen's Reader Expectation Approach to the English Language: A New Tweetment.^[9] In Expectations, Gopen acknowledges the relationship between REA and prior linguistic frameworks, devoting a section to functional sentence perspective as developed by the Prague School of Linguistics, and discussing similarities and differences in a companion section titled "Thrusts and Parries."^[3]

Gopen argues that to arrive at the meaning a writer intended, readers must correctly answer five questions for every sentence they read: what is happening in this sentence; whose story it is; how the sentence links backward to the preceding sentence; how the sentence leans forward to what follows; and which words should be read with special emphasis as the most important information. Gopen argues that the answers to all five questions are determined primarily by the structural location of words rather than by word choice or word meaning. When structural expectations are violated, Gopen argues that readers must redirect their finite reserve of interpretive energy from understanding content to deciphering structure. The following concepts describe the structural locations through which readers seek answers to these questions.^{[1][2][5][6][7][10]} The following concepts describe the structural locations through which readers seek answers to these questions.

Gopen argues that what precedes any word or sentence controls how readers interpret it, and that a sentence's opening position should carry familiar, contextualizing information while new or emphasized information belongs at the close.^{[8][1][11][12]}

Gopen argues that each sentence should open with information that connects backward to the preceding sentence, carrying readers forward through a passage without effort, and that this principle of connectivity extends from the sentence to the paragraph level. ^{[13][7][1][11]}

Gopen defines a stress position as any point where the grammatical structure of a sentence comes to a complete close, and argues that writers should place their most important information at these points, since readers naturally emphasize whatever appears there.^{[6][1][11][12]}

Lorelei Lingard of Western University applies REA principles to academic prose in a medical education context. She argues that reader expectation theory is central to achieving clarity and flow in scholarly writing, and situates it within established research in rhetoric, linguistics, and cognitive psychology. Lingard also notes that for readers of English as an additional language, structural expectations described by the approach "may not be so intuitive," while suggesting this makes the approach useful as an explicit framework for non-native writers navigating English readers' expectations.^[11] Virginia B. Kraus, Professor of Medicine at Duke University, drew direct parallels between REA principles and compositional strategies in landscape art, applying REA concepts to scientific writing in a peer-reviewed clinical journal.^[12]

The Purdue Writing Lab incorporated REA principles into its resource guide for consulting on graduate-level academic writing, arguing that the goal of clarity in expression applies beyond scientific writing to any discipline where writers must communicate complex ideas.^[14]

Actor and science communicator Alan Alda discussed REA in his 2017 book If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face?, drawing on his experience in performance to illustrate Gopen's concepts of topic position and stress position — likening the expectation that action follows quickly from a sentence's opening to an actor coming onstage and doing something immediately, and the emphasis carried by a sentence's close to the punchline of a joke. Alda also raised questions about whether a writer can reliably access a reader's perspective, drawing on Steven Pinker's The Sense of Style to note skepticism that such perspective-taking is fully possible, while suggesting that novelists and actors demonstrate a comparable capacity for it.^[15]

The Gopen and Swan 1990 article has been adopted as a primary resource for graduate-level scientific writing instruction at multiple research universities and professional schools,^{[16][17][18][19]} and the Legal Writing Institute honored Gopen with a Golden Pen Award in 2011, citing his development of REA as a contribution to the quality of legal writing.^[20]

In a 2015 interview on The State of Things on WUNC, host Frank Stasio interviewed Gopen about his life, career, and the Reader Expectation Approach.^[10] In a 2017 interview for the University of Pittsburgh Humanities Center podcast Being Human, Gopen discussed the development of REA and its relationship to his background in classical music, law, and rhetoric.^[5]

• Scientific writing
• George David Gopen
• American Scientist

• George Gopen's Reader Expectation Approach to Writing in the English Language — official website
• George Gopen — official website