Cubicity
In the mathematical field of graph theory, cubicity is a graph invariant defined to be the smallest dimension such that a graph can be realized as the intersection graph of axis-parallel unit cubes in Euclidean space. Cubicity was introduced by Fred S. Roberts in 1969, along with a related invariant called boxicity that considers the smallest dimension needed to represent a graph as the intersection graph of axis-parallel rectangles in Euclidean space.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, cubicity is a graph invariant defined to be the smallest dimension such that a graph can be realized as the intersection graph of axis-parallel unit cubes in Euclidean space.[1] Cubicity was introduced by Fred S. Roberts in 1969, along with a related invariant called boxicity that considers the smallest dimension needed to represent a graph as the intersection graph of axis-parallel rectangles in Euclidean space.[2]

Definition
[edit]This article only considers simple, undirected graphs, with finite and non-empty vertex sets.[3][4]
The cubicity of a graph , denoted by , is the smallest integer such that can be represented as the intersection graph of axis-parallel closed unit -cubes in -dimensional Euclidean space, .[5][6][7]
For , a graph can have such a representation in if and only if is the intersection of indifference graphs on the same vertex set as .[8]
The cubicity of a complete graph is defined to be zero.[9]
Relations to certain graph classes, upper bound
[edit]For a graph if and only if is complete.[10]
For a graph if and only if is a unit interval graph that is not complete.[11]
For where denotes the star graph of ( center and) vertices, and denotes the floor function.[12][13]
For where denotes the complete multipartite graph with parts of cardinal .[14][15]
For a graph on vertices, Moreover, this upper bound is best possible in terms of .[16][17]
Relations to other graph dimensions
[edit]Relations to boxicity: bounds
[edit]The cubicity of a graph is closely related to its boxicity, denoted by The definition of boxicity is essentially the same as that of cubicity, but with axis-parallel boxes instead of axis-parallel unit cubes.
Since a cube is a special case of a box, the cubicity of a graph is always an upper bound for its boxicity, i.e.,
In the other direction, it can be shown that for a graph on vertices, where denotes the ceiling function. Moreover, this upper bound is tight.[18]
Relations to sphericity
[edit]The sphericity of a graph denoted by is defined in the same way as cubicity but with congruent spheres instead of axis-parallel unit cubes.
For certain graphs, cubicity exceeds sphericity; the five-pointed star, is an example: [19]
In the other direction, graphs can be constructed so that for [20]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 309, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, pp. 301–310)
- ^ Chandran & Mathew (2009, p. 2, Section 1)
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 309, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, p. 302, Section 1) uses closed cubes of side-length .
Footnote 1 on p. 302: "Boxes are not necessarily closed, though it is not hard to show that if a representation [of ] is attainable with [open] boxes in , it is attainable with closed boxes in .". - ^ Chandran & Mathew (2009, p. 2, Section 1, Definition 4) use Cartesian products of closed intervals .
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 309, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, pp. 302–303, Section 2)
Indeed: iff iff i.e.,
And so: iff iff such that i.e.,
but may be i.e., may - ^ Chandran & Mathew (2009, p. 2, Section 1, Definition 4)
- ^ Roberts (1969, p. 304, Section 3, Proof of Theorem 2)
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 310, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, p. 303, Section 3, Theorem 1)
- ^ That is, cub(K1,n) = ⌈log₂(n)⌉. Proof: ∀ n ∈ ℕ*, 1 ≤ n; so, 0 < n ≤ 2n−1. ∀ n ∈ ℕ*, ∃! c ∈ ℕ such that n ≤ 2ᶜ ≤ 2n−1 (namely, c is the least k ∈ ℕ such that n ≤ 2ᵏ); so, ∃! c ∈ ℕ such that log₂(n) ≤ c ≤ log₂(2n−1). So, ⌈log₂(n)⌉ = c = ⌊log₂(2n−1)⌋.
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 310, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, p. 304, Section 3, Theorem 2)
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 310, Section 1)
- ^ Roberts (1969, p. 306, Section 4, Theorem 5)
- ^ Chandran & Mathew (2009, p. 3, Section 2, Theorem 1)
- ^ Fishburn (1983, p. 309, Section 1)
- ^ Fishburn (1983, pp. 310–318, Sections 2–3)
References
[edit]- Chandran, L. Sunil; Mathew, K. Ashik (2009-04-28), "An upper bound for Cubicity in terms of Boxicity", Discrete Mathematics, 309 (8): 2571–2574, arXiv:math/0605486, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2008.04.011, ISSN 0012-365X, S2CID 7837544
- Fishburn, Peter C. (1983-12-01), "On the sphericity and cubicity of graphs", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 35 (3): 309–318, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(83)90057-6, ISSN 0095-8956
- Roberts, Fred S. (1969), "On the boxicity and cubicity of a graph", in Tutte, W. T. (ed.), Recent Progress in Combinatorics (PDF), Academic Press, pp. 301–310, ISBN 978-0-12-705150-5