Book review
A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is described, and usually further analyzed based on content, style, and merit. A book review may be a primary source, an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view. Books can be reviewed for printed periodicals, magazines, and newspapers, as school work, or for book websites on the Internet. A book review's length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay. Such a review may evaluate the book based on personal taste. Reviewers may use the occasion of a book review for an extended essay that can be closely or loosely related to the subject of the book, or to promulgate their ideas on the topic of a fiction or non-fiction work. Beyond their function as literary commentary, book reviews are recognized in information science for providing descriptive depth that exceeds standard bibliographic records. In digital library systems, the integration of book review content into discovery layers supports resource identification and improves search accuracy by bridging formal classification with user-centered language. Some journals are devoted to book reviews, and reviews are indexed in databases such as the Book Review Index and Kirkus Reviews; but many more book reviews can be found in newspaper and scholarly databases such as Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and discipline-specific databases.
A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is described, and usually further analyzed based on content, style, and merit.[1] A book review may be a primary source, an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view.[2] Books can be reviewed for printed periodicals, magazines, and newspapers, as school work, or for book websites on the Internet. A book review's length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay. Such a review may evaluate the book based on personal taste. Reviewers may use the occasion of a book review for an extended essay that can be closely or loosely related to the subject of the book, or to promulgate their ideas on the topic of a fiction or non-fiction work. Beyond their function as literary commentary, book reviews are recognized in information science for providing descriptive depth that exceeds standard bibliographic records. In digital library systems, the integration of book review content into discovery layers supports resource identification and improves search accuracy by bridging formal classification with user-centered language.[3]
Some journals are devoted to book reviews, and reviews are indexed in databases such as the Book Review Index and Kirkus Reviews; but many more book reviews can be found in newspaper and scholarly databases such as Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and discipline-specific databases.
History
[edit]Photios I of Constantinople has been called "the inventor of the book review" for his work, Bibliotheca.[4]
Preservation
[edit]Historical book reviews, particularly those in 19th and early 20th-century newsprint, require specialized environmental management due to their fragile physical media. These materials are highly susceptible to acidic hydrolysis and lignin oxidation, which cause paper to become brittle. Archival standards for such documents recommend maintaining a stable temperature below 18°C (64°F) and relative humidity between 35% and 45% to slow chemical degradation and ensure long-term accessibility of the historical record.[5][6] Native digital book reviews, on the other hand, face the risks of outdated formats and invalid links. To mitigate the risk of information loss, digital libraries and archives implement strategies such as data migration and the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). These technical measures ensure that permanent links between book reviews and their corresponding scholarly works remain functional regardless of changes to hosting platforms or web infrastructure.[7]
Types of reviews
[edit]Academic reviews
[edit]Academic book reviews are both a form of academic service and a contribution to the academic literature.[8] They are frequently published as a section or part of academic journals.[9] They help the profession understand what has been happening in their profession, and work on the emerging intellectual challenges of their field.[8] However, not all academics are incentivized to take on the work required in a book review, because they are often not rewarded for that work.[8] Book reviews can be used to predict which monographs are likely to have subsequent citations.[9] Beyond their critical role in scholarly discourse, these reviews are increasingly integrated as functional components of academic communication data. Metadata standards like Schema.org enable reviews to be structured as independent entities that are semantically linked to the original reviewed work or reviewer. The implementation of these linked data standards facilitates the discoverability of scholarly monographs within citation indexes and institutional knowledge bases, ensuring that critical reviews are effectively cross-referenced across global research infrastructures.
Newspaper and magazine reviews
[edit]Newspaper reviews became prominent in the 18h century, as a form of reader responses.[10] They were common throughout the 19th and 20th century. However, the decline of newspapers began in the 21st century, and book reviews have suffered along with other newspaper sections. The Associated Press (a service many newspapers subscribe to that produces articles shared among all of them) announced it would no longer be producing book reviews in 2025, although they would still publish stories about current events that intersect with major books.[11]
In academic criticism, popular book reviews in newspapers and magazine reviews are often used to evaluate the relative audience and impact of books during a period.[10] In addition to their role in academic exchanges, book reviews also serve as quality indicators for the development of library collections. Academic librarians utilize the evaluative content of book reviews to make informed decisions regarding the purchase and elimination of old monographs. Furthermore, systematic analysis of book reviews is increasingly being employed in bibliometrics to assess the influence and acceptance of academic works within a specific discipline.[12]
See also
[edit]- Australian Book Review
- BookBrowse
- Booklist
- The Book Club Bible
- Claremont Review of Books
- Kirkus Reviews
- Library Journal
- Literary criticism
- London Review of Books
- National Book Critics Circle
- The New York Review of Books
- Publishers Weekly
- Self-Publishing Review
- Shelf Awareness
References
[edit]- ^ Princeton (2011). "Book reviews". Scholarly definition document. Princeton. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- ^ Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2011). "Book reviews". Scholarly definition document. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Archived from the original on September 10, 2011. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- ^ Spink, A.; Robins, D.; Schamber, L. (1998). "Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication". Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49 (4): 364–374. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<364::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-3.
- ^ Reynolds, L. D. and N.G. Wilson (1991). Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 321. ISBN 0-19-872145-5.
- ^ Primeaux, A. (2011). "Review of Preserving Archives and Manuscripts, 2nd ed., by M. L. Ritzenthaler". The American Archivist. 74 (1): 352–355.
- ^ "A Guide to Environmental Management of Archival Material" (PDF). The National Archives. Retrieved 2026-03-29.
- ^ Harvey, D. R.; Weatherburn, J. (2005). Preserving Digital Materials. München: KG Saur. p. 57. ISBN 9783598116865.
- ^ a b c Runnels, Curtis (January 1994). "Book Reviews". Journal of Field Archaeology. 21 (3): 357–390. doi:10.1179/009346994791547544. ISSN 0093-4690.
- ^ a b Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian; Purnell, Philip J. (2014-02-01). "The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes". Scientometrics. 98 (2): 841–852. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1176-4. ISSN 1588-2861.
- ^ a b Lavin, Matthew J. (2020-01-30). "Gender Dynamics and Critical Reception: A Study of Early 20th-century Book Reviews from The New York Times". Journal of Cultural Analytics. 5 (1). doi:10.22148/001c.11831.
- ^ Charles, Ron (August 18, 2025). "The future of book reviews looks grim". The Washington Post.
- ^ Zuccala, A.; van Leeuwen, T. (2011). "Book reviews in humanities research evaluations". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62 (10): 1979–1991. doi:10.1002/asi.21588.
Further reading
[edit]- Chen, C. C. (1976), Biomedical, Scientific and Technical Book Reviewing, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ.
- Ingram, Helen M.; Mills, Penny B. (1989). "Reviewing the Book Reviews". PS: Political Science and Politics. 22 (3): 627. doi:10.2307/419632. JSTOR 419632.
- Katz, Bill (1985). "The Sunny Book Review". Technical Services Quarterly. 3 (1–2): 17–25. doi:10.1300/J124v03n01_03.
- Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities. The flow of ideas within and among disciplines. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
- Miranda, E. O. (1996), "On book reviewing", Journal of Educational Thought, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 191–202.
- Motta-Roth, D. (1998), "Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: a study of text and disciplinary cultures", in Fortanet, I. (Ed), Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, Universitat Jaume, Castelló de la Plana, pp. 29–58.
- Nicolaisen, J. (2002a). "Structure-based interpretation of scholarly book reviews: a new research technique". Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science. pp. 123–135. Archived from the original on Aug 18, 2005.
- Nicolaisen, Jeppe (2002). "The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields". Research Evaluation. 11 (3): 129–140. doi:10.3152/147154402781776808.
- Nielsen, Sandro (2009). "2. Reviewing printed and electronic dictionaries: A theoretical and practical framework". Lexicography in the 21st Century. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice. Vol. 12. pp. 23–41. doi:10.1075/tlrp.12.04nie. ISBN 978-90-272-2336-4.
- Novick, Peter (1988). That Noble Dream. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816345. ISBN 9780521357456. S2CID 158050677.
- Rampola, Mary Lynn (2010). "Critiques and book reviews", A Pocket Guide to Writing in History, Sixth Edition, pp. 26–28.
- Riley, L. E. & Spreitzer, E. A. (1970), "Book reviewing in the social sciences", The American Sociologist, Vol. 5 (November), pp. 358–363.
- Sabosik, Patricia E. (1988). "Scholarly reviewing and the role of choice in the postpublication review process". Book Research Quarterly. 4 (2): 10–18. doi:10.1007/BF02910823. S2CID 144380238.
- Sarton, G. (1960). "Notes on the Reviewing of Learned Books". Science. 131 (3408): 1182–1187. Bibcode:1960Sci...131.1182S. doi:10.1126/science.131.3408.1182. PMID 17773924.
- Schubert, A.; Zsindely, S.; Telcs, A.; Braun, T. (1984). "Quantitative analysis of a visible tip of the peer review iceberg: Book reviews in chemistry". Scientometrics. 6 (6): 433–443. doi:10.1007/BF02025830. S2CID 32648183.
- Snizek, W. E. & Fuhrman, E. R. (1979), "Some factors affecting the evaluative content of book reviews in sociology", The American Sociologist, Vol. 14 (May), pp. 108–114.
- Spink, Amanda; Robins, David; Schamber, Linda (1998). "Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication". Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49 (4): 364–374. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<364::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-3.
- Zuccala, Alesia; Van Leeuwen, Thed (2011). "Book reviews in humanities research evaluations". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62 (10): 1979–1991. doi:10.1002/asi.21588. hdl:1887/17652. S2CID 33669460.
External links
[edit]
Quotations related to Book review at Wikiquote- "Book reviews" at The Writing Center - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| Production | |
|---|---|
| Consumption | |
| By country | |
| Other |
|
| Related | |
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
